Alerter augmentation system

ABSTRACT

An alerter augmentation system includes one or more processors that determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system. The one or more processors also generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay. These input requests seek responses or action by the operator in an attempt to keep or make the operator alert. The one or more processors change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests and/or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined.

FIELD

Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to systems thatmonitor alertness of operators of machinery (e.g., vehicles) and thatimplement responsive actions based on the alertness of the operators.

BACKGROUND

Some machinery includes alerter systems that periodically promptoperators of the machinery for a response. For example, some vehiclesmay prompt drivers of the vehicles to depress a button at regular timeintervals to try and ensure that the drivers are alert during control ofthe vehicles.

These alerter systems may provide the prompts for operator action on aregular, unchanging basis with respect to time. For example, a promptmay be provided every minute or several minutes. Other alerter systemsmay provide the prompts at a frequency that is based on how fast avehicle is moving. The prompts may be provided at a more rapid rate orgreater frequency for faster speeds of the vehicles and at slower ratesor reduced frequencies for slower speeds of the vehicles.

Operators who are alert may find the prompts unnecessarily intrusive andobstructive to control of the vehicles. The requirement to repeatedlyrespond to the prompts even considering the operators being aware canserve as an additional distraction to the same operation of thevehicles.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

In one embodiment, a system (e.g., an alerter augmentation system)includes one or more processors configured to determine an alertness ofan operator of a vehicle system. The one or more processors also areconfigured to generate operator input requests that are separated intime by a temporal delay, the one or more processors configured tochange one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests or atype of the input requests that are generated based at least in part onthe alertness of the operator that is determined.

In one embodiment, a method (e.g., for augmenting operation of analerter system) includes determining an alertness of an operator of avehicle system using a monitoring system, and changing one or more of atemporal delay between successive input requests provided by an alertersystem of the vehicle system or a type of the input requests provided bythe alerter system based at least in part on the alertness of theoperator that is determined.

In one embodiment, a system (e.g., an alerter augmentation system)includes one or more processors configured to automatically instruct analerter system to generate requests for operator input at time intervalsin order to maintain an alertness of an operator controlling a poweredsystem. The one or more processors also are configured to direct thealerter system to one or more of change the time intervals between therequests or change a type of the requests responsive to a change in thealertness of the operator.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter described herein will be better understood fromreading the following description of non-limiting embodiments, withreference to the attached drawings, wherein below:

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an alerter system and a monitoringsystem;

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of a method foraugmenting an alerter system of a powered system; and

FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an alerter augmentation system.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

One or more embodiments of the inventive subject matter described hereinprovide systems and methods that augment alerter systems in machinerythat is at least partially operated by human operators. The systems andmethods described herein can obtain information on how alert an operatoris and, based on the alertness or non-alertness of the operator, thesystems and methods can change how the alerter system operates. Forexample, the augmentation systems and methods described herein canreceive data indicative of an alertness of the operator. This data (alsoreferred to as alertness data) can indicate a quantifiable score orvalue representative of how alert the operator is. Different values forthe alertness data can indicate different levels of operator alertness,and changes in the values of the alertness data can indicate changes inhow alert an operator is.

The augmentation systems and methods can change the frequency (or rate)and/or type of alerts provided by the alerter system based on thealertness of the operator (and/or based on changes in the alertness ofthe operator). For example, if the operator is more alert or thealertness of the operator increases, then the temporal (e.g., time)delay or time interval between successive prompts provided by thealerter system for operator interaction or input may increase. Fewer orless frequent alerts may need to be provided to the operator due to theincreased alertness of the operator. In contrast, if the operator isless alert or the alertness of the operator decreases, then the temporaldelay between successive prompts for operator input may decrease. Morefrequent alerts may need to be provided to the operator due to thedecreased alertness of the operator.

The type of alertness (e.g., prompt for operator input) provided by thealerter system may be changed by the augmentation systems and methodsbased on the operator alertness. For example, if the operator is morealert or the alertness of the operator increases, then the prompts foroperator input provided by the alerter system may remain or be changedto visual prompts, such as the flashing of a light, text or otherindicium presented on a display device, etc. If the operator is lessalert or the alertness of the operator decreases, then the prompts foroperator input may be changed to audible prompts (such as loud alarms orbells), haptic prompts (e.g., the vibrating of an operator seat orcontrol), and/or a combination of visual, audible, and/or hapticprompts.

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an alerter system 100 and amonitoring system 102. The alerter system 100 provides prompts to anoperator 104 of machinery, such as a vehicle (also referred to as avehicle system), stationary powered system, or the like. The alertersystem 100 can provide visual prompts by flashing one or more lightgenerating devices 106, by displaying information on a display device108, by turning off or on the light in the cabin or room in which theoperator 104 is located, by changing a color of the light in the cabinor room in which the operator 104 is located, or the like. The alertersystem 100 can include and/or be operably connected with (e.g., via oneor more wired and/or wireless connections) one or more input devices112. The input device 112 can include buttons, touchscreens, pedals,levers, switches, keys, or the like, that are actuated by the operator104. The alerter system 100 can determine if the operator actuates theinput device 112 responsive to providing an alert or prompt. If theinput device 112 is actuated, the alerter system 100 may provide anadditional prompt or alert at a later time. If the input device 112 isnot actuated in response to the alert or prompt, then the alerter system100 may automatically implement one or more responsive actions, such asslowing or stopping movement of the vehicle, turning off the poweredsystem controlled by the operator, or the like.

The monitoring system 102 includes one or more sensors 110, such ascameras that obtain images or video of the operator 104 to extractvarious physical (such as specific micro-expression associated withnuanced muscle movement, macro-expressions, eye closure (blink-rates),head nodding, and yawning etc., thermal (e.g., infrared) sensors toobtain thermal imagery of the face of the operator, or the like. Themonitoring system 102 examines the information obtained or sensed by thesensors 110 to extract various physical and psychophysiological features(pulse rate, respiration rate, heart rate variability, peak-to-peakamplitudes, power in harmonics, deep learning, etc.). This informationis used by the monitoring system 102 to estimate fatigue and drowsinessof the operator, which is represented by an alertness score generated bythe monitoring system 102. The monitoring system 102 can determine thealertness of the operator based on one or more differences between acurrent operator behavior and a historical operator behavior. Forexample, if an operator begins to drop his or her shoulders or otherwisechange posture, yawn, close his or her eyes, etc., then the monitoringsystem 102 may determine that the operator is less alert. One example ofsuch a monitoring system 102 is described as a control system in U.S.patent application Ser. No. 15/397,469, the entire disclosure of whichis incorporated herein by reference.

Based on the alertness of the operator as determined by the monitoringsystem 102, an alerter augmentation system (shown and described below)can change how the operator input prompts (e.g., alerts) generated bythe alerter system 100 are presented to the operator.

FIG. 2 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of a method 200 foraugmenting an alerter system of a powered system. The method 200 mayrepresent at least some of the operations performed by the alerteraugmentation system described herein, and can represent operationsperformed by one or more software applications directing the functionsof the alerter augmentation system. Optionally, the method 200 mayrepresent an algorithm used to create such software applications.

At 202, one or more operator input requests are generated. The inputrequests may be referred to as alerts or prompts. The input requests aregenerated by the alerter system 100, and can include visual, audible,and/or haptic alerts provided via the alerter system 100, as describedabove. The input requests may be repeatedly provided by the alertersystem 100. For example, the alerter system 100 may activate a light,generate a sound, or the like, once every five minutes to ensure thatthe operator remains alert during operation of the powered system.

At 204, a determination is made as to whether a response to an inputrequest is received from the operator in response to generation of aninput request. For example, the alerter system 100 may determine whetherthe operator has actuated the input device 112 within a designatedperiod of time (e.g., five seconds) following generation or provision ofthe previous input request by the alerter system 100. If an operatorresponse to the previous input request is not received or detected bythe alerter system 100, then the lack of a response may indicate thatthe operator is not alert. As a result, flow of the method 200 mayproceed toward 206. But, if an operator response is received, then theresponse can indicate that the operator is at least alert enough torespond to the input request. As a result, flow of the method 200 canproceed toward 208.

At 206, operation of the powered system may change. If the poweredsystem is a vehicle, then the alerter system 100 may automaticallyengage a brake system of the vehicle to slow or stop movement of thevehicle. If the powered system is another type of machine or system ofmachines, then the alerter system 100 may deactivate or turn off thepowered system or otherwise change operation of the powered system to astate where the lack of an operator or lack of an alert operator poseslittle to no risk of safety or harm to the operator or others. Flow ofthe method 200 may then terminate or return to another operation, suchas 202.

At 208, operation of the powered system may continue. For example, incontrast to slowing or stopping a vehicle or deactivating the poweredsystem, the powered system may continue to operate as before because theoperator responded to the input request previously provided.

At 210, alertness of the operator is determined. The monitoring system102 can determine an alertness score (or rating, value, or the like)that indicates how alert the operator is. For example, the monitoringsystem 102 can determine how alert an operator is using one or moreembodiments of the control systems and methods described in U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/397,469, entitled “Systems and Methods forVoltage Sensing” filed 3 Jan. 2017.

Optionally, the alertness of the operator may be determined based onresponses of the operator to one or more previous input requests. Forexample, operators that respond within a designated period of time tomore input requests may have a greater alertness score than operatorsresponding to fewer input requests within the designated period of time.

At 212, a determination is made as to whether the input requestsprovided to the operator are to be changed. If the operator is alert (asindicated or determined from the alertness determined at 210), then thefrequency at which the input requests are provided to the operator maybe able to be decreased. For example, the alerter system 100 may be ableto delay the time between when successive input requests are generateddue to the operator being alert or more alert. As another example, thealerter system 100 may be able to provide a different type of alert,such as an alert that is not as loud or bright, to the operator due tothe operator being alert or more alert. The frequency and/or type ofalert may be changed so as to avoid unnecessarily obstructing orinterfering with the tasks performed by the alert operator.

If the operator is not alert (as indicated or determined from thealertness determined at 210), then the frequency at which the inputrequests are provided to the operator may be increased. For example, thealerter system 100 may shorten the time between when successive inputrequests are generated due to the operator not being alert or being lessalert. As another example, the alerter system 100 may be able to providea different type of alert, such as an alert that is louder or brighterthan one or more previous alerts. The frequency and/or type of alert maybe changed so as to try and increase the alertness of the operator.

The determination of whether or not to change the alertness of theoperator may be made by comparing the alertness score or data determinedby the monitoring system 102 to a designated threshold and/or to aprevious alertness score. If the alertness score of the operator is lessthan the threshold and/or is less than the previous alertness score,then flow of the method 200 may proceed toward 214. If the alertnessscore of the operator is at least as large as the threshold and/or is atleast as great as the previous alertness score, then flow of the method200 may proceed toward 216.

At 214, the input requests provided by the alerter system are changed.The augmentation system may direct the alerter system to change theinput requests by communication of one or more control signals from theaugmentation system. In one aspect, the control signals may beautomatically generated and communicated by the augmentation systemresponsive to determining that the alertness of the operator is too low(e.g., as determined at 212). In response to receiving these directionsfrom the augmentation system, the alerter system 100 may change theinput requests provided to the operator. In one embodiment, the alertersystem 100 can change the frequency at which the input requests areprovided. This can be accomplished by the alerter system 100 reducingthe temporal delay between when successive input requests are generated,thereby causing the input requests to be provided more often.Optionally, the alerter system 100 can change the type of input requestsprovided to the operator. For example, the alerter system 100 mayincrease the volume, pitch, etc., of sounds generated; increase thebrightness, intensity, color, etc. of lights generated; change the textor images displayed; increase the magnitude and/or frequency ofvibrations generated; or the like. As another example, the alertersystem 100 can change a combination of input requests that are provided.If the alerter system 100 previously was providing visual inputrequests, then the alerter system 100 may begin providing visual,audible, and/or haptic requests.

In another aspect, the control signals may be automatically generatedand communicated by the augmentation system responsive to determiningthat the operator is alert or is more alert than before (e.g., asdetermined at 212). In response to receiving these directions from theaugmentation system, the alerter system 100 may change the inputrequests provided to the operator. In one embodiment, the alerter system100 can change the frequency at which the input requests are provided.This can be accomplished by the alerter system 100 increasing thetemporal delay between when successive input requests are generated,thereby causing the input requests to be provided less often.Optionally, the alerter system 100 can change the type of input requestsprovided to the operator. For example, the alerter system 100 maydecrease the volume, pitch, etc., of sounds generated; decrease thebrightness, intensity, color, etc. of lights generated; change the textor images displayed; reduce the magnitude and/or frequency of vibrationsgenerated; or the like. As another example, the alerter system 100 canchange a combination of input requests that are provided. If the alertersystem 100 previously was providing a combination of visual, audible,and/or haptic input requests, then the alerter system 100 may beginproviding only visual, audible, or haptic requests.

The augmentation system may direct the alerter system 100 to change thefrequency and/or type of input requests regardless of the speed at whichthe vehicle is moving. For example, the speed of the vehicle may changewithout impact on how the input requests change. The frequency and/ortype of input requests may change in identical manners (or remain thesame) even if the vehicle speeds up or slows down.

At 216, a determination is made as to whether operation of the poweredsystem is to be changed. If the operator is not responding to the inputrequests and/or if the alertness of the operator (as determined at 210)is too low, then operation of the powered system may be changed. As aresult, flow of the method 200 can proceed toward 218. But, if theoperator is responding to the input requests (e.g., within thedesignated period of time) and/or if the alertness of the operator isnot too low, then operation of the powered system may not be changed. Asa result, flow of the method 200 can return toward 202 or optionally mayterminate.

At 218, one or more responsive actions are implemented. For example, inresponse to the alertness of the operator being too low (e.g., asdetermined by the monitoring system 102 and/or based on a lack ofresponse to input requests as determined by the alerter system 100),operation of the powered system being controlled by the operator may beautomatically change. The monitoring system 102, alerter system 100,and/or augmentation system may automatically generate and communicate acontrol signal that causes a propulsion system of the vehicle to slowmovement of the vehicle and/or that causes a brake system of the vehicleto engage and slow or stop movement of the vehicle.

In one embodiment, the control signal may direct a controller of thevehicle to switch from automatic control of movement of the vehicle tomanual control of the vehicle. For example, responsive to the alertnessscore of the operator dropping below an upper designated threshold, thecontroller may automatically switch from automatically controllingmovement of the vehicle to manual control of the vehicle. Optionally,the control signal may direct the controller of the vehicle to switchfrom manual control of the vehicle (e.g., control by the operator) toanother automatic control of the vehicle. The automatic control may be adecreased or reduced operational mode, such as automatic control of thevehicle, but at a slower speed than previously moving under control ofthe operator, a slower speed than previously dictated by an energymanagement system (described below), etc. This can occur responsive tothe alertness score of the operator dropping below a lower designatedthreshold. This can allow for the vehicle to continue operating but withdecreased risk of damage to others or the vehicle relative to travelingat faster speeds and/or relative to operator control of the vehicle.Following 218, flow of the method 200 may then return toward 202 or mayterminate.

FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an alerter augmentation system 300.The augmentation system 300 may be operably coupled with a poweredsystem 302, such as by being communicatively coupled with the poweredsystem 302 by one or more wired and/or wireless connections. The poweredsystem 302 is illustrated as a vehicle, such as an automobile, railvehicle, truck, bus, mining vehicle, marine vessel, aircraft, or otheroff-highway vehicle (e.g., a vehicle that is not designed for travel onpublic roadways and/or is not legally permitted for travel on publicroadways). Alternatively, the powered system 302 may be a stationarysystem, such as a power plant, a facility where operators monitor alocation (e.g., a security facility), etc. The augmentation system 300can represent hardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected withone or more processors (e.g., microprocessors, integrated circuits,and/or field programmable gate arrays) that perform the operationsdescribed above. For example, the processors may determine the alertnessof the operator from the alertness data output by the monitoring system102, determine whether to change the input requests generated by thealerter system 100, and/or instruct the alerter system 100 to change theinput requests, as described above.

The alerter system 100 and/or the monitoring system 102 can representhardware circuitry that includes and/or is connected with one or moreprocessors (e.g., microprocessors, integrated circuits, and/or fieldprogrammable gate arrays) that perform the operations described above.For example, the processors may generate control signals to direct oneor more output devices 304 (e.g., the light generating devices 106,display device 108, vibration-generating or haptic devices, etc.) toprovide the input requests, monitor and determine the alertness of theoperator, generate and provide the alertness data to the augmentationsystem 300, determine whether the operator has responded to the inputrequests, etc., as described above.

A controller 306 of the powered system 302 represents hardware circuitrythat includes and/or is connected with one or more processors (e.g.,microprocessors, integrated circuits, and/or field programmable gatearrays) that control operation of the powered system 302. The controller306 can receive input from the operator via the input device 112, canreceive an operational plan from an energy management system 308 (“EMS”in FIG. 3), and/or receive a control signal from the alerter system 100(and optionally the monitoring system 102 and/or augmentation system300). Based on the received input, operational plan, and/or controlsignal, the controller 306 may generate instruction signals that arecommunicated to a propulsion system 310 and/or brake system 312 of thepowered system 302. The instruction signals direct operation of thepropulsion system 310 and/or brake system 312, such as by directing thepropulsion system 310 to increase or decrease the speed of the poweredsystem 302, directing the brake system 312 to engage or release brakesof the powered system 302, or the like.

The energy management system 308 represents hardware circuitry thatincludes and/or is connected with one or more processors (e.g.,microprocessors, integrated circuits, and/or field programmable gatearrays) that determine the operational plan for the powered system 302.Optionally, the energy management system 308 is off-board or outside ofthe powered system 302. The operational plan dictates one or moreoperational settings of the powered system 302 for different times,different locations along one or more routes, and/or different distancesalong the one or more routes. The operational plan may designate speeds,throttle settings, brake settings, accelerations, etc., for the poweredsystem 302 in order to reduce the fuel consumed and/or emissionsgenerated by the powered system 302 while resulting in the poweredsystem 302 arriving within a scheduled time period relative to thepowered system 302 traveling according to other settings, such as bytraveling at an upper speed limit of the route.

The propulsion system 310 represents one or more components thatgenerate tractive effort to move the powered system 302. The propulsionsystem 310 can represent one or more engines, motors, propellers, etc.The brake system 312 represents one or more brakes of the powered system302, such as air brakes, friction brakes, regenerative brakes (e.g., oneor more of the motors of the propulsion system 310), etc.

In one embodiment, a system (e.g., an alerter augmentation system)includes one or more processors configured to determine an alertness ofan operator of a vehicle system. The one or more processors also areconfigured to generate operator input requests that are separated intime by a temporal delay, the one or more processors configured tochange one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests or atype of the input requests that are generated based at least in part onthe alertness of the operator that is determined.

Optionally, the one or more processors determine the alertness of theoperator based on one or more differences between a current operatorbehavior and a historical operator behavior.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to change thetemporal delay between the input requests regardless of a moving speedof the vehicle system.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to change thetemporal delay between the input requests by increasing the temporaldelay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertnessof the operator that is determined indicating that the operator isalert.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to determine thatthe alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alertresponsive to the alertness one or more of exceeding a designatedthreshold score or increasing from a previously determined alertness.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to change thetemporal delay between the successive input requests by decreasing thetemporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to thealertness of the operator indicating that the operator is less alertthan a previous time.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to determine thatthe alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is less alertresponsive to the alertness one or more of not exceeding a designatedthreshold score or decreasing from a previously determined alertness.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to change the typeof the input requests by switching from visually providing the inputrequests to audibly providing the input requests.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to change the typeof the input requests provided by the alerter system by switching fromaudibly providing the input requests to visually providing the inputrequests.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to automaticallyapply a brake of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of theoperator decreasing below a designated threshold score.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to automaticallyswitch from automatic control of movement of the vehicle system tomanual control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to thealertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated thresholdscore.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to automaticallyswitch from manual control of the movement of the vehicle system toreduced operation automatic control of the movement of the vehiclesystem responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below asmaller, second designated threshold score.

In one embodiment, a method (e.g., for augmenting operation of analerter system) includes determining an alertness of an operator of avehicle system using a monitoring system, and changing one or more of atemporal delay between successive input requests provided by an alertersystem of the vehicle system or a type of the input requests provided bythe alerter system based at least in part on the alertness of theoperator that is determined.

Optionally, the alertness of the operator is determined based on one ormore differences between a current operator behavior and a historicaloperator behavior.

Optionally, changing the temporal delay between the successive inputrequests occurs regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system.

Optionally, changing the temporal delay between the successive inputrequests includes increasing the temporal delay between the successiveinput requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that isdetermined indicating that the operator is alert.

Optionally, the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator isalert when the alertness as determined by the monitoring system one ormore of exceeds a designated threshold score or increases from apreviously determined alertness.

Optionally, changing the temporal delay between the successive inputrequests includes decreasing the temporal delay between the successiveinput requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that isdetermined indicating that the operator is less alert than a previoustime.

Optionally, the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator isless alert when the alertness as determined by the monitoring system oneor more of does not exceed a designated threshold score or decreasesfrom a previously determined alertness.

Optionally, changing the type of the input requests provided by thealerter system includes switching from visually providing the inputrequests to audibly providing the input requests.

Optionally, changing the type of the input requests provided by thealerter system includes switching from audibly providing the inputrequests to visually providing the input requests.

Optionally, the method also includes automatically applying a brake ofthe vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator that isdetermined decreasing below a designated threshold score.

Optionally, the method also includes automatically switching fromautomatic control of movement of the vehicle system to manual control ofthe movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of theoperator that is determined decreasing below a first designatedthreshold score.

Optionally, the method also includes automatically switching from manualcontrol of the movement of the vehicle system to reduced operationautomatic control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive tothe alertness of the operator that is determined decreasing below asmaller, second designated threshold score.

In one embodiment, a system (e.g., an alerter augmentation system)includes one or more processors configured to automatically instruct analerter system to generate requests for operator input at time intervalsin order to maintain an alertness of an operator controlling a poweredsystem. The one or more processors also are configured to direct thealerter system to one or more of change the time intervals between therequests or change a type of the requests responsive to a change in thealertness of the operator.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to direct thealerter system to increase a time delay between successive requests foroperator input responsive to the alertness of the operator increasingand to direct the alerter system to decrease the time delay responsiveto the alertness of the operator decreasing.

Optionally, the one or more processors are configured to direct acontroller of the powered system to automatically change from manualcontrol of the powered system to automatic control of the powered systemresponsive to a decrease in the alertness of the operator.

It is to be understood that the above description is intended to beillustrative, and not restrictive. For example, the above-describedembodiments (and/or examples thereof) may be used in combination witheach other. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt aparticular situation or material to the teachings of the inventivesubject matter without departing from its scope. While the dimensionsand types of materials described herein are intended to define theparameters of the inventive subject matter, they are by no meanslimiting and are exemplary embodiments. Many other embodiments will beapparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the abovedescription. The scope of the inventive subject matter should,therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, alongwith the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Inthe appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used asthe plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and“wherein.” Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,”“second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are notintended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. Further, thelimitations of the following claims are not written inmeans-plus-function format and are not intended to be interpreted basedon 35 U.S.C. § 112(f), unless and until such claim limitations expresslyuse the phrase “means for” followed by a statement of function void offurther structure.

This written description uses examples to disclose several embodimentsof the inventive subject matter and also to enable a person of ordinaryskill in the art to practice the embodiments of the inventive subjectmatter, including making and using any devices or systems and performingany incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the inventive subjectmatter is defined by the claims, and may include other examples thatoccur to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such other examples areintended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structuralelements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, orif they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantialdifferences from the literal languages of the claims.

The foregoing description of certain embodiments of the inventivesubject matter will be better understood when read in conjunction withthe appended drawings. To the extent that the figures illustratediagrams of the functional blocks of various embodiments, the functionalblocks are not necessarily indicative of the division between hardwarecircuitry. Thus, for example, one or more of the functional blocks (forexample, processors or memories) may be implemented in a single piece ofhardware (for example, a general purpose signal processor,microcontroller, random access memory, hard disk, and the like).Similarly, the programs may be stand-alone programs, may be incorporatedas subroutines in an operating system, may be functions in an installedsoftware package, and the like. The various embodiments are not limitedto the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the drawings.

As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceededwith the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding pluralof said elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly stated.Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the inventive subjectmatter are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence ofadditional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.Moreover, unless explicitly stated to the contrary, embodiments“comprising,” “including,” or “having” an element or a plurality ofelements having a particular property may include additional suchelements not having that property.

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: one or more processors configured to determine an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system, the one or more processors also configured to generate operator input requests that are separated in time by a temporal delay, the one or more processors configured to change one or more of the temporal delay between the input requests or a type of the input requests that are generated based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the vehicle system to manual control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the vehicle system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors determine the alertness of the operator based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior.
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system.
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the input requests by increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert.
 5. The system of claim 4, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert responsive to the alertness one or more of exceeding the first designated threshold score or increasing from a previously determined alertness.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the temporal delay between the successive input requests by decreasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator indicating that the operator is less alert than a previous time.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine that the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is less alert responsive to the alertness one or more of not exceeding the first designated threshold score or decreasing from a previously determined alertness.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests by switching from visually providing the input requests to audibly providing the input requests.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the type of the input requests provided by the alerter system by switching from audibly providing the input requests to visually providing the input requests.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically apply a brake of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a third designated threshold score.
 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.
 12. A method comprising: determining an alertness of an operator of a vehicle system using a monitoring system; changing one or more of a temporal delay between successive input requests provided by an alerter system of the vehicle system or a type of the input requests provided by the alerter system based at least in part on the alertness of the operator that is determined; automatically switching the vehicle system from automatic movement control to manual movement control responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and automatically switching from the manual movement control of the vehicle system to reduced operation of the automatic movement control of the vehicle system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the alertness of the operator is determined based on one or more differences between a current operator behavior and a historical operator behavior.
 14. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests occurs regardless of a moving speed of the vehicle system.
 15. The method of claim 12, wherein changing the temporal delay between the successive input requests includes increasing the temporal delay between the successive input requests responsive to the alertness of the operator that is determined indicating that the operator is alert.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the alertness of the operator indicates that the operator is alert when the alertness as determined by the monitoring system one or more of exceeds the first designated threshold score or increases from a previously determined alertness.
 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising changing movement of the vehicle system while the vehicle system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing.
 18. A system comprising: one or more processors configured to automatically instruct an alerter system to generate requests for operator input at time intervals in order to maintain an alertness of an operator controlling a powered system, the one or more processors also configured to direct the alerter system to one or more of change the time intervals between the requests or change a type of the requests responsive to a change in the alertness of the operator, wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from automatic control of movement of the powered system to manual control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a first designated threshold score, and wherein the one or more processors are configured to automatically switch from manual control of the movement of the powered system to reduced operation automatic control of the movement of the powered system responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing below a smaller, second designated threshold score.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the one or more processors are configured to direct the alerter system to increase a time delay between successive requests for operator input responsive to the alertness of the operator increasing and to direct the alerter system to decrease the time delay responsive to the alertness of the operator decreasing.
 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the one or more processors are configured to change the movement of the powered system while the powered system is moving responsive to the alertness of the operator changing. 